The current opinion of the Supreme Court of Spain
is that the autographic signature is not the only form of signature,
since there are other types of graphic symbols that, without being
properly autograph, purport to ownership and therefore bind. Thus,
codes, signs and stamps can be construed as being proper signatures.
Also, and although the signature is a very important
part of the document, it is not of the essence, in that there are
documents without signature that shall be admissible for the purpose
of proving authorship. For example, domestic paperwork, records,
files, archives, accountancy books, etc.
Similarly, signature in electronic documents can
be substituted by either ciphers, signs, codes or other alfa-numeric
devices used in electronic commerce. These can be brought as evidence
where the source and veracity allow to determine authorship. The
definition of document in these cases is obviously a broad one and
includes any disc, tape, soundtrack or ther device in which sounds
or other data are embodied so as to be capable of being reproduced
therefrom. This definition is well adapted to computerised records
and any device for storing and processing infromation.
Although in Spain the assimilation of electronic
signature to ordinary signature is well established by the jurisprudence,
it is important to have these principles enshrined in the proposed
EC directive.
|